Rethinking secularism and role of religion. Do we need new models of secularism?

Home Discussion Discussion Rethinking secularism and role of religion. Do we need new models of secularism?

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • Hey, I am Ilkham Umarakhunov and I am trying to find best solutions for state and religious groups to leave a happy life.

      I want to devote this post to several issues: the role of religion, the perception of secularism and what questions we should  ask. Let this post be an introduction and a basis for further discussions.

      In any questions where the accuracy of the definition is needed, it is necessary to use the “conceptual framework”. In simple terms: to give definitions to the terms we use.

      I will talk a lot about “religion” and “secularism.” Sometimes about “violent extremism” and “radicalization”. Why sometimes? Yes, I just do not want to associate issues of religion with extremism (there will be a separate post about this).

      I don’t want to get boring with the use of the “understanding conceptual framework”, but to speak philosophically and in simple language.

      Secularism is the separation of religion from authority (not from the state).

      But there are other things, for example, the principle of neutrality, when the state treats all religions in the same way, where no religion can be established as state or obligatory

      Also, the basis of a secular state is to ensure freedom of religion and belief. One might ask, what does “belief” have to do with it? So, belief refers to people who do not follow any religion or atheists. It is important to ensure not only the right to believe or profess a certain religion / confession (I will explain the difference in a separate post), but also not to believe. Secularism – for me it is a kind of agreement, when the state protects the rights to freedom of religion and conscience in exchange for the exclusion of religion from power.

      I have to make a note that there are many models of secularism. And the process of their formation is dynamic. The most important thing for the state is to find the very model that suits everyone as much as possible and serves for the “common good”.

      I am concerned with the question of what model we should design and adopt. Secularism is a term or phenomenon that originated in the West, where there was a struggle to separate power from the church. We have never had such a process in our history (Asia). Therefore, the issue of contextualization (change or adaptation to local realities) is very relevant. There is a lot of controversy around this.

      What is secularism and religiosity for you? The answers will vary. It is necessary to examine how our understanding of these definitions is to shape or influence the advancement of secularism.

      Now I have raised more questions than answered. But this makes our journey with you in this area even more interesting. What worries you?

      Reply
    • I agree with Ilkham that the idea of a ‘secular’ state that separates religious authority and state authority is a Western phenomenon that  arose from the desire to remove political power from the all pervading control of the Church in Europe. But it’s very hard to define a secular state in practice. The UK has a state religion (Queen Elizabeth is head of the Church of England) but it is highly secular whereas the USA which has a clear separation of religion and state as declared in the Constitution, is highly religious. The majority of Americans report that religion plays a very important role in their lives. And let’s not go into France’s Laicite laws which ‘privatized’ religion and may as a result be accused of not allowing religious freedom for many in the public space.

      Religion actually plays different roles in different societies whether the state is officially secular or not and a lot depends on the culture and social norms within the particular context. It seems to me that the real issue is how much people feel safe and free to practice their religion (or not to believe at all) and whether the state protects or discriminates against them accordingly.

      What is happening in your country? How safe do you feel?

      Reply
    • And let’s not go into France’s Laicite laws

      Of course, this is what I was thinking of while reading Ilkham’s post 😂 I think France’s laïcité is such a strong example of intertwined religion, culture, and politics shaping a particular conception of secularism. With France as an example, when a particular sect of a religion has such a strong effect on a culture and its politics, it’s not shocking when a certain ‘flavor’ of secularism in practice looks more like laïcité for anyone who isn’t Catholic because other non-separations of religion from authority are long-held cultural practices, beliefs, etc.

      Where I come from in West Michigan in the US, we see this a lot but accelerated by American polarization. In our context, party identification and theology are tightly interwoven on the political right, but less so on the left. Growing up, I had a lot of friends who were never religious, but as they got more politically polarized, they began to adopt more fundamentalist protestant Christian identities along with their party identity. Because our region has a particular history of Christian fundamentalism (to clarify, I say fundamentalist in a theological sense, not in a derogatory sense), we see this effect pop up in seemingly strange ways, including my favorite—a ‘pro-life drain commissioner’ billboard before non-partisan county elections. For my home region, I’m not sure what bipartisan secularism would look like or if it’s even possible.

      Reply
Viewing 2 reply threads

Reply

Reply To: Rethinking secularism and role of religion. Do we need new models of secularism?

By participating in these Discussion Forums, you are agreeing to our Discussion Forum Guidelines

Trending Topics