What are your best practices or examples for successfully integrating conflict sensitivity into peacebuilding programs or other sectoral programming?
Home › Discussion › Discussion › What are your best practices or examples for successfully integrating conflict sensitivity into peacebuilding programs or other sectoral programming?
- This topic has 10 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 3 months ago by Vitale Muviso Muhindo.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
ConnexUs & USAID are hosting Conflict Sensitivity & Integration: How Peacebuilders Can Influence Development Outcomes, an online crowdsourced knowledge-sharing campaign, through the end of 2022.
You’re invited to participate however you can from wherever you are. One way that you can contribute is by responding to this question to both share with and learn from ConnexUs’ global community:
What are your best practices or examples for successfully integrating conflict sensitivity into peacebuilding programs or other sectoral programming?
We look forward to your responses!
Created 11/18/2022 at 5:41 pmReply -
Hi All,
What I would suggest coming from my Women’s Rights Organization background is to :
1. use gender sensitive conflict analysis tools to understand how conflicts affects women and girls differently.
2. let your programming or interventions speak to the 4 pillars of WPS Agenda
3. Create a situation room for Early conflict warning system and to gather useful data
4. Inclusivity should be prioritized
Created 11/21/2022 at 2:34 pmReply-
Thank you for sharing your recommendations! Where can we learn more about your organization? I’d love to read more
Created 11/30/2022 at 1:31 amReply
-
-
Conflict sensitivity can be incorporated along the full project cycle. This includes the design phase with conflict analysis and inclusivity (as Uduak mentioned) as well as conflict-aware implementation, monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) processes that not only seek to avoid during harm in the way information is collected and shared (for example), but also maximizes peacebuilding opportunities by seeing MEL as *intervention* rather than an add-on process. Also similar to Uduak, optimizing monitoring to serve as an early warning systems is also helpful, despite most MEL money being reserved for evaluations. Another tool I have used is crafting personas to represent the groups of people touched by/involved in an intervention. This helps you think through what various actions might mean for that group as well as how they can most effectively be involved.
Created 11/23/2022 at 6:43 pmReply-
Ah, very interesting! Have you put out any learning resources on crafting personas? It sounds like a really helpful practice/tool
Created 11/30/2022 at 1:33 amReply-
Hi Zander. We will be including some information on crafting personas in the forthcoming Environmental Peacebuilding M&E Toolkit! It should be ready early next year. A good way to stay up-to-date is through the Environmental Peacebuilding Association and its M&E Interest Group.
Created 11/30/2022 at 2:21 pmReply -
Oh awesome! I’ll keep an eye our for that & get signed up for the M&E Interest Group, thanks!
Created 12/02/2022 at 10:12 pmReply
-
-
-
Changes in a fragile context are unexpected. In response and to regulary adapt program strategies (minimizing risks and maximizing opportunities for peace), we have put in place a simple and practical checklist to monitor the level of conflict sensitivity in our cross cutting programs in Sahel region. All the teams take part in this follow-up. This good practice allows us to be effective in monitoring conflict dynamics and be also proactive in programmatic adaptations without harming.
Created 11/30/2022 at 2:07 pmReply-
Are these checklists publicly available? Sounds like a great practice!
Created 11/30/2022 at 2:21 pmReply-
Hi Amanda.
Yes we can discuss it separately, it’s a checklist that we can share but must be presented for its appropriation. There are score levels per question which must be understood for its application.
Created 11/30/2022 at 4:57 pmReply
-
-
-
for my peacebuilding experience in great lakes region iwould suggest to:
– To develop the community based peacebuilding policy discusions in a hollistic approaches for a sustainable and lasting peace impact.
– Connecting MHPSS to conflict prevention initiatives and peacebuilding, this is to stike back the controverses about the relevance of forgiveness in peacebuilding and protracted social conflicts.
– gendered approaches to peacebuilding and pconflict prevention: for our specific context, specialy in eastern of DR Congo, women are made more vulnerables because of the pre existing inequality in the so-called peaceful society, andd then, ignoring gender power relations and inequalities in a society can leade to an oversight of some of fundemental causes of conflicts and degenerate trauma and violence .
Created 01/11/2023 at 9:33 amReply
-
Reply
Trending Topics
Related Discussions
Localizing climate, peace, and security
Following our Thursday Talk with local peacebuilding practitioners on climate security, there were questions that we didn't get to address, so we're sharing them below. Do you have a question for the speakers, GPPAC, and/or...
Reconciliation in theory & in practice
Welcome to the discussion following up on the Thursday Talk on Reconciliation with Thania Paffenholz, John Paul Lederach, Andrei Gomez Suarez & Friederike Bubenzer! We received so many great questions during the webinar, and unfortunately,...